There are two end-times futurism camps.  In one, the USA is here and continues on, and in the other it is destroyed, nuked, and enslaved.  Jonathan Cahn is in the destroyed, nuked, and enslaved camp, as is “a prophecy of jacob and esau”.  Historicism, Preterism, and one branch of futurism do not generally incorporate that view.

The author claimed that the administration in the USA wants civil strife (January 16, 2026).

The Trump administration wants to force showdowns that lead inevitably to what happened in Minneapolis Wednesday.

The site remains due to its great value as source of information related to the “America gets destroyed in the end times” spiritual teachings camp.  I am reminded of some words of Jesus, since we are discussing a site that teaches the Targum.

Then Jesus said unto them, “Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.”

And they reasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have taken no bread”.

Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, “O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? ”

Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. (Matthew, ch. 16: KJV, Geneva Bible, pp. 1006, 1,007)

In another place, Jesus mentions hypocrisy.  Mixing what one claims to be truth with civil strife talking points would seem to qualify as hypocrisy.

In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, “Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.   For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.” (Luke 12, KJV, Geneva Bible, p. 1056)

“For Many Americans, ‘Temp’ Work Becomes a Permanent Way of Life” appeared on NBC News in April of 2014. The article follows Kelly Sibla and others who joined the ranks of the permanent no-benefit-no-FMLA class of temporary employees. The market started calling ‘temp’ jobs ‘contract’ jobs around the end of the Great Recession. “…labor economists warn that companies’ growing hunger for a workforce they can switch on and off could do permanent damage to these workers’ career trajectories and retirement plans” (Maddie McGarvey, 2014).Andrew Moran, writing for Time Doctor looked at the same issue in “Employee Extinction? The Rise of the Contract, Temp Workers in Business” using Federal Reserve data and other countries. The phenomenon is not unique to the United States, however the United States does not have a social safety net for things like housing the way that other countries do.

James Balogun wrote a career advice piece on the subject called “Here’s the Deal with Contract to Hire Positions”, and although he left out the valuable statistics about the majority never converting to full time employees, the article provides a great analysis on the scenarios when taking such a job. The best quote is “Let’s be clear here. The employee is the one taking the risk in a contract to hire, not the employer”. (Balogun, 2016)

Outcome-Based Religion by Mac Dominick describes the management theories of Peter Drucker and their penetration into organized religion in Chapter 13. It’s an interesting read and describes the mode of many denominations to act in a business manner. It details theological seminaries and Pharmaceutical company foundations working with seminaries via foundations (Eli Lilly, among others). The book mentions one “community church” that makes hundreds of referrals for psychiatric care annually. Dominick refers to this as the rise of “Christian Psychology”. It’s an interesting read, but like many other works that discuss the Roman Catholic faith, fact-checking assertions remains a good idea. One example of such claims is the assertion that Catholicism teaches that salvation exists in all faiths, but, in August 2016, Brother Andre Marie wrote an explanation detailing the misunderstandings of that view.

Dr. Ed Hindson at Liberty University wrote an article denying preterism in 2005 called The New Last Days Scoffers. Donald Perkins discusses the refutation and explains the futurism view. J. R. Bronger wrote another analysis of the preterist view in August 1999, and calledRealized Eschatology a poisonous belief. Bronger used a broad brush, but made strong arguments, including references to Hymenaeus and Philetus, historical figures who claimed the resurrection was already past. JM wrote a more recent article with strong arguments opporsed to futurism. Jame’s Loyd’s article at Christian Media Research takes issue with preterism and contains historical detail in addition to scriptural analysis while keeping Daniel’s 7 debated years in the past rather than the future.